| | schmack | 08-18-2009 14:29 [E,W] | | It would be a great piece if it had been cropped at the navel. the hands holding the weapons look so unnatural, inelegant and after-thoughtish.... |
| | Wes | 08-19-2009 00:13 [E,W] | | This is one of the most horrendous Photoshop jobs I've ever seen. |
| | MGKC | 08-17-2009 15:58 [E,W] | | That gun has to be photo-shopped, lol. |
| | Bitter Lemon | 01-15-2010 16:07 [E,W] | | Why does an angel need hand guns and knife? I would have thought wrath of God would be more locusts and asps. |
| | infinever | 10-16-2009 19:53 [E,W] | | I agree the weapons look a bit awkward. But I don't think it would be better cropping them out. You would lose the danger, and the story. I doubt your everyday consumer would even notice they looked ''photoshop'd''. Good poster. |
| | K Lee. | 10-16-2009 20:48 [E,W] | | I know!! What is he holding onto? Apparently that automatic weapon doesn't have a handgrip of any kind. |
| | Zachary Pennington | 08-17-2009 16:06 [E,W] | | The gun looks awkward, mostly because it's so white. It's possible that it's in the shot, but it just looks wrong and far too prominent. |
| | J.D. | 08-15-2009 02:48 [E,W] | | Wow, that gun looks totally not added in after the fact. |
| | jared Marshall | 08-15-2009 22:09 [E,W] | | the top half is better than the bottom half. horrible photoshop with the gun and knife. the diner on the bottom is just confusing with the date and website over the top |
| | el chupa negra | 01-20-2010 12:09 [E,W] | | I highly doubt that anyone other than designers would notice the ''photoshoped'' aspect of the weaponry. Plus, it does not look that bad...nice colors, cool campaign. |
| | whombat | 02-02-2010 18:42 [E,W] | | This poster falls apart from the hands down. You don’t have to be a photoshop artist to tell something looks shoe-horned in... |
| | trl... | 02-04-2010 14:55 [E,W] | | attack of the baby sized arms! |
|
