| | Alice | 11-24-2008 18:23 [E,W] | Lame, generic, and lazy.
Hudson and Hathaway look ever so pleased with life- not at all at war. |
| | nuetron | 11-24-2008 00:38 [E,W] | Is there an idea here I’m missing? They don’t seem to be at
odds about anything. |
| | Matt! | 11-29-2008 09:47 [E,W] | | What would have made this poster way better is a change of facial expression. This is just lazy. |
| | nesbit | 01-05-2009 20:14 [E,W] | This poster is livin in an unsuccessful vacuum. When you see the ''living one sheet'' it makes sense cuz they fight and then return to normal... but alone its
no good conceptually... one little shiner would have made all the difference. Client blew this one! |
| | Sofia | 08-02-2009 01:29 [E,W] | | At war? Really? They look like ''Oh, we are friends and getting married together! Yay!'' |
| | Brian Gareth | 10-09-2008 17:20 [E,W] | | Anne Hathaway looks like the perfect wife. Kate looks tired. |
| | emarkd | 03-19-2009 07:52 [E,W] | | I think the designers were going for a "duel at 10 paces" type of pose, with the bouquets standing in for the guns. It fails miserably, though, mainly because of the facial expressions. |
| | Tweeker | 10-08-2008 23:54 [E,W] | | F- |
| | neutron | 10-09-2008 01:10 [E,W] | | Is there a concept in here somewhere? Somebody please tell me what I’m missing. Or did the veep at FOX just not the cajones to bring anything to this water cracker at all. Come see a movie about these two pretty girls - nothing happens! |
| | bluebelle9 | 10-10-2008 18:29 [E,W] | | I feel like this really could've used a tagline to tell us something, anything, about the movie. |
| | Luis | 10-10-2008 14:57 [E,W] | | what's up with the eyes?? |
|
