| w00t | 06-06-2008 17:53 [E,W] | | what is wrong with dane cook's head? yikes!! | | Josh M | 06-06-2008 17:37 [E,W] | Boy, I just love when the sightlines don't even come close to matching up? What the hell are they looking at?
Oh, and I've seen better Photoshop on Fark any day of the year. | | Myst | 06-09-2008 11:50 [E,W] | | They went a little overboard with airbrushing Dane Cook. Give him a shave and some eyeshadow and he could be Kate Hudson's ugly sister. | | Adam | 06-09-2008 13:21 [E,W] | | Awful, generic junk. And why has Dane Cook got higher billing than an Oscar nominee? | | Derek | 06-06-2008 19:23 [E,W] | | This is quite honestly one of the worst posters for a movie in a while. I can't quite place what's so horrible about it, but it's absolutely horrendous. | | em cee | 06-06-2008 21:41 [E,W] | | awful!! no way this is a finished poster...bad head strip...depth of field is way off...type layout very boring...copyline so very, very unclever. A tired, unimaginative love triangle concept. I know these romantic comedies are a tough solve but at least make the execution look good. | | N_Skye | 06-06-2008 22:34 [E,W] | Ugh, what a HAWT mess!
All those pasted-on tacky-looking heads!
Just plain AWFUL. |
|
